You’re driving along and suddenly the bright sun blinds you. In that moment your car slams into another car causing an accident. Are you at fault?
Reverse roles. You’re driving along minding your own business and suddenly without warning a car in the oncoming lane crosses the center line and strikes your car. The other driver explains “The bright sun temporarily blinded me it’s not my fault.”
Solar glare can temporarily blind a driver and potentially cause accidents and injuries if nothing is done about it. How does the law handle the challenging issue?
In one Massachusetts car accident case, the driver found at fault claimed that solar glare was at least partly to blame for the crash. She said that as she approached the other car, she was blinded by the low still rising sun that flashed into her eyes. Unfortunately her own insurance company found her at fault for the accident and surcharged her auto insurance.
When she appealed, the hearings officer found that she failed to compensate for solar glare. The officer wrote that the driver failed to exercise due care in the operation and control of her car and that she “should have compensated for solar glare”. In an unpublished decision, Wheeland v. Commerce Insurance Company, the Massachusetts Court of Appeals on November 4, 2015 upheld the hearing officer’s decision, as well as a mid level appeal to the Superior Court.
There is no law excusing a driver from liability in an accident due to solar glare. In fact, the rules of the road specifically require that drivers operate with due care in light of the circumstances. Even a sudden sun flare is a circumstance, then, that the rules of the road require us all to deal with.
What can drivers do to avoid solar glare?
Other tips, borrowed from the AAA website, include leaving more following room when the sun is in the driver’s eyes, and, if having difficulty in a sudden situation look for lane markings to guide travel.
In one case that went to court, a driver heading into an intersection looked to the right, then to the left and all of a sudden was “blinded by the sun”, then struck and killed a pedestrian. The driver claimed he was unable to do anything to avoid it. But in Lifson v. City of Syracuse, decided in October, 2011 the Court of Appeals of New York held the driver responsible for striking and killing the pedestrian despite the claim that the accident occurred due to temporarily blinding bright solar glare.
So the answer to the original questions raised above: solar glare is no defense against driving with due care in all the circumstances, and will not absolve one of civil liability for accidents caused by glare.
The decisions cited above represent actual cases decided on the facts presented. Every case presents its own unique facts and circumstances which can potentially alter the final result.
Views: 992
https://youtu.be/hxVgw42ZWCU Karen Read stands accused of second degree murder in the death of boyfriend John…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3I5RrlifCs&t=139s Traffic circles, rotaries and roundabouts. Is there a difference? Does the distinction blur as…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSGI2SpKwdg&t=8s Certain fireworks are legal in New Hampshire. What changes became effective in recent years? …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtZTQGOJ7P4&t=9s Bollards: Are you safe? Was there even a time when you never heard about…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgP1oi05kNc 00:00:00:00 - 00:00:19:13 Unknown Hi, I'm Laney Law and I'm attorney Andrew Myers. Even…
Always get a receipt. Always check your receipt. Call me whatever you want. But always…